Hip Replacement Lawsuits and Hip Recalls

  • Issue: Defective artificial hip implants

Lieff Cabraser has been recognized by U.S. News, Best Lawyers, and the National Law Journal as one of the top plaintiffs' law firms in the nation. Please contact us by completing the contact form below or calling us toll-free at 1 800-541-7358.

An estimated 500,000 patients in the United States have received metallic hip implants, also known as titanium hip replacements. While marketed by device manufacturers as more durable than earlier generation artificial implants using ceramic, plastic, and other materials, many recipients of metal-on-metal hip implants have experienced the premature failure of their implants. As a result, the injured patients have had to undergo further painful and costly operations, called revision surgery, to remove the faulty metal implant and insert a new device.

The DePuy ASR and certain DePuy Pinnacle, Stryker Rejuvenate and Stryker AGB II, Wright Profemur-Z hip system and the Zimmer Durom Cup are all-metal implants or contain metal components which come in contact with each other, leading to friction that releases metallic particles.

Symptoms of Hip Implant Failure

Patients who have received all metal implants should be aware of symptoms which may indicate that their device is not functioning properly. Common symptoms may include:

  • Regular and prolonged pain in the groin, hip or leg
  • Swelling at or near the hip joint
  • A limp or change in walking ability

Stryker Rejuvenate & ABG II Hip Recall & Lawsuits

Lieff Cabraser represents hip replacement patients across America in Stryker lawsuits to obtain just compensation for their pain, suffering, lost wages, and other losses from the failure of their Stryker hip implants.

Stryker began selling the Rejuvenate hip system in 2009 and the ABG II hip system in 2010. Two years later, Stryker recalled these hip implants. Stryker did not conduct any clinical testing on the safety and effectiveness of the Rejuvenate and ABG II hip systems before selling the devices.

On November 3, 2014, the parties announced a settlement of the litigation valued at over $1 billion.

Learn more about the Stryker hip recall and lawsuits.

DePuy Hip Recall & Lawsuits

Patients represented by Lieff Cabraser have filed lawsuits against DePuy seeking compensation for their pain, suffering, and other physical injuries, and the cost of replacement surgery and other financial difficulties as a result of the failure of their DePuy ASR Hip Resurfacing systems and ASR XL Acetabular hip implants. The DePuy hip recall lawsuits charge that DePuy concealed the fact that its ASR hip implant was defective from patients and physicians.

On November 19, 2013, Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiary DePuy announced that they will pay at least $2.5 billion to settle thousands of individual lawsuits charging the ASR hip implant was defective. Each patient who had to undergo revision surgery to replace a faulty DePuy hip device would receive a base award of $250,000. In addition, J&J will set up a $475 million fund to cover the costs of extraordinary medical injuries, such as strokes, heart attacks or multiple surgeries to replace artificial hips.

Read a summary of the J&J DePuy hip settlement from Lieff Cabraser attorney Wendy Fleishman. Learn more about the DePuy hip recall and lawsuits.

Wright Medical Profemur Hip Injuries

The Profemur-Z modular hip system is a hip replacement device manufactured by Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Wright Medical marketed the Profemur-Z hip as being a more durable product than other artificial hip implants and one especially suited for persons with active lifestyles.

Lawsuits filed by patients against Wright Medical charge that the titanium Profemur hip is defective and that patients have experienced Wright hip injuries. Rather than functioning in the intended manner, the complaints charge that the titanium Profemur-Z modular neck is prone to fretting, degradation, and fracture.

Learn more about Wright Medical hip implant injury lawsuits.

Zimmer Durom Cup Implant Failures

Lieff Cabraser serves as Co-Liaison Counsel for patients nationwide injured by the defective Durom Cup manufactured by Zimmer Holdings. First sold in the U.S. in 2006, Zimmer marketed its 'metal-on-metal' Durom Cup implant as providing a greater range of motion and less wear than traditional hip replacement components. In July 2008, Zimmer announced the suspension of Durom sales.

The complaints charged that the Durom cup was defective and led to the premature failure of the implant. In 2011 and 2012, numerous patients represented by Lieff Cabraser settled their cases with Zimmer on favorable, confidential terms. As of 2014, Lieff Cabraser continues to represent new clients injured by Zimmer Durom hip implants.

Contact Lieff Cabraser

If you or a family member have had to undergo replacement surgery for a defective hip implant or have been told your prosthetic hip must be replaced, please use the form below to contact an experienced Lieff Cabraser personal injury attorney, or call us toll-free at 1 800-541-7358 and ask to speak to attorney Lexi Hazam.

Lieff Cabraser has successfully represented hundreds of patients across America in individual defective medical device cases, including helping obtain a settlement worth over $1 billion for patients who received faulty hip and knee implants manufactured by Sulzer Corporation.

We welcome the opportunity to review your claim. We will respond promptly and there is no charge or obligation on your part to retain our firm as your attorney.

Trademark Notice

The DePuy ASR XL Acetabular and ASR Hip Resurfacing systems are trademarks of DePuy Orthopaedics and Johnson & Johnson Company. The Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II are trademarks of Stryker Corporation. The Wright Profemur-z is a trademark of Wright Medical. These trademarks are used for informational and product identification purposes only. Lieff Cabraser is not affiliated with any of these companies, and nothing on this website has been authorized or approved by them.

By Wendy Fleishman



"You were responsive to my questions and concerns at all times. The quality of representation was excellent."

Jill in Indiana
Client in dangerous prescription drug case View More Testimonials