Button - go to Our Firm page
Button - go to Attorney Profiles page
Button - go to Contact page
 
Graphic: Search our site   

Photo - Gavel and Law Books
Return to Home Page
Link to Our Offices page
Link to Current Cases page
Link to Practice Areas page
Link to Media Center page
Link to Articles page
Link to News page
Link to About Class Actions page
Link to Class Notices
Link to Newsletter page
Link to Public Interest Cases page
Link to Trial Experience page
Link to Legal Links page
Link to Employment page
Link to Disclaimer page
Link to Privacy Policy page
Link to Site Map page
 
  
Life After Amchem (continued)
Page 15
Perhaps it is most fitting that plaintiffs increasingly resort to state courts as their battlegrounds of choice for their claims against corporate defendants. Although the law recognizes corporations as persons and makes no distinction between the human and the corporate, and although corporations enjoy perpetual existence and an accumulation of capital unmatched by mere humans, it was not always so. Modern limited-liability corporations are creations of the mid-to-late nineteenth century.57 They are creatures of state charter -- not federal law -- and exist at the state's sufferance. As a principle of law, courts must make no distinction between humans and corporations as equal persons before the law: every jury receives this instruction in every trial involving a corporate defendant.58
However, how this equality is implemented to achieve justice between these two very different categories of persons is in the ambit of the equity jurisdiction employed by every court. That corporations dread the states who gave them life, and that corporations have fueled a massive outcry against the notion of nationwide classes in state courts, is the ultimate irony. State-chartered corporations act nationally and internationally. State courts to whom they owe their existence should be free to certify nationwide classes of individuals with claims against them. Only then will the equitable precepts of economy, efficiency, equal access, and empowerment be fulfilled.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17

NOTES
57  See, STEPHEN B. PRESSER, PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL § 1.02 (rev. ed. 1997); Oscar Handlin & Mary F. Handlin, Origins of the American Business Corporation, 5. J. ECON. HIST. 1, 3 (1945).
58  See, e.g., H. ALSTON JOHNSON, III, 18 LOUISIANA CIVIL LAW TREATISE, CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS § 2.01 (1994).

You must deliberate on this case without regard to sympathy, prejudice, or passion for or against any party to the suit. This means that the case should be considered and decided as an action between persons of equal standing in the community. A corporation or an insurance company is entitled to the same fair trial at your hands as a private individual. All persons stand equal before the law, and are to be dealt with as equals in a court of justice.

Id.

About Lieff Cabraser
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is a fifty-plus attorney law firm that has represented plaintiffs nationwide since 1972. We have offices in San Francisco, New York and Nashville. We represent plaintiffs in class and group actions and in individual lawsuits in cases involving substantial losses. For the last five years, the National Law Journal has selected Lieff Cabraser as one of the top plaintiffs' law firms in the nation.
Notice
This website is sponsored by Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, a national plaintiffs' law firm.

Our offices
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
E-Mail: mail@lchb.com
Firm Website: www.lieffcabraser.com


Notice: Lieff Cabraser attorneys provide legal advice and practice law for clients in federal district courts throughout the United States and in state courts where we are licensed to practice. In states in which our lawyers are not licensed to practice, we have affiliations with local attorneys who serve as co-counsel with our firm. Please read our disclaimer.

Copyright © 2008 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP