National Arbitration Forum
Consumer Fraud Lawsuit
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, with co-counsel, is representing consumers in a class action lawsuit against the National Arbitration Forum ("NAF"), and several entities related to NAF. The suit alleges that the defendants conspired to conduct sham consumer debt arbitrations that harmed consumers.
Case Update: Court Rules Consumers' Fraud and Racketeering Claims May Go Forward Against National Arbitration Forum and Its Owners
On February 22, 2010, U.S. District Court Judge Paul A. Magnuson denied in large part motions to dismiss the class action lawsuit filed by consumers against the NAF and several entities that own NAF, alleging fraud and racketeering activity. The plaintiffs, consumers whose debt disputes were submitted to binding arbitration before the NAF, allege NAF conducted sham arbitrations that resulted in rulings in favor of creditors.
Read the Court's order.
Arbitration Under the National Arbitration Forum
As the largest consumer credit arbitration company in the nation, the NAF holds itself out to the public, courts and consumers as a neutral third party arbitration service. The NAF claims it is independent of the debt collection agencies and creditors that use its services.
In fact, as alleged in the complaint against the NAF and the other defendants, the NAF is closely tied to the credit and debt collections industries. As a result, consumers whose cases are arbitrated through the NAF are placed at a significant disadvantage. Specific allegations against the NAF include:
- The NAF has conspired with several major creditors to mandate binding arbitration clauses in the term and condition of sale in standard consumer debt agreements such as credit cards, consumer loans, utilities, telecommunications, health care and consumer leases. This conspiracy eliminates consumer access to the court system.
- The NAF conceals its link to the credit agencies through extensive affirmative representations, material omission and complex and opaque corporate structuring.
- The NAF conducts sham arbitrations which virtually always result in a favorable ruling for the banks and credit card companies that utilize NAF's services.
- The NAF has profited unfairly from this biased process.
Contact Lieff Cabraser
If you received an arbitration judgment against you from National Arbitration Forum, we wish to learn of your experience. Please click here to contact a Lieff Cabraser attorney to discuss your case. There is no charge or obligation for our review of your case.
About Lieff Cabraser
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is a sixty-plus attorney law firm that has represented plaintiffs nationwide since 1972. We have offices in San Francisco, New York and Nashville. We represent plaintiffs in class and group actions and in individual lawsuits in cases involving substantial losses. For the last seven years, The National Law Journal has selected Lieff Cabraser as one of the top plaintiffs' law firms in the nation.
Notice
This website is sponsored by Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, a national plaintiffs' law firm.
Notice: Lieff Cabraser attorneys provide legal advice and practice law for clients in
federal courts throughout the United States and in state courts where we are
licensed to practice. Please read our disclaimer.
Copyright © 2010 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP.
No persons pictured on this website are clients of Lieff Cabraser.