University of Phoenix Fraud
(False Claims Act) Lawsuit
Background on the University of Phoenix Lawsuit
With co-counsel, Lieff Cabraser represents two former University of Phoenix enrollment counselors in a lawsuit filed under the False Claims Act that alleges the Internet-based school knowingly misled the U.S. Department of Education to become eligible for its students to collect financial aid.
The plaintiffs, Mary Hendow and Julie Albertson, charge that the university paid its enrollment counselors "based directly on enrollment activities," even as it told the government otherwise. Under Title IV of the Higher Education Act, universities that qualify for aid are barred from giving recruiters incentives, like commissions and bonuses, to boost enrollment. The suit seeks damages for federal loans and grants obtained by thousands of students.
Hundreds of thousands of former University of Phoenix students without degrees are obligated to pay back high interest loans for decades. "The vast majority of these students should not have been recruited and enrolled," explained Nancy Krop, part of the plaintiffs' team of attorneys. "The complaint charges that the university urges counselors to enroll students without reviewing their transcripts to determine their academic qualifications to attend the university, which results in many students being unable to repay their loans."
Summary of University of Phoenix False Claims Act Lawsuit
The University of Phoenix is the nation's largest, private, for-profit higher education institution providing educational programs for working adult students. On its website, the university promotes itself as "the largest institution of higher learning in the U.S., serving approximately 300,000 students through its more than 250 campuses and learning centers across the country."
The lawsuit was filed in 2003 by two enrollment counselors of the university under the False Claims Act, a statute that permits whistle-blowers to sue on behalf of the government for fraud committed against the government and share in the recovery if the suit is successful.
About 80% of its students receive federal financial aid, according to government records. The University of Phoenix collects approximately $2 billion a year in taxpayer-funded federal financial aid on behalf of its students, crediting students for tuition paid.
Many students who enroll at the University of Phoenix never complete their education, and many are unable to even finish the classes they signed up for. First time freshmen have a 7% program completion rate, according to a June 2005 report of the National Consumer Law Center. The lawsuit asserts that the school urges counselors to enroll students without determining their academic qualifications to attend university.
The lawsuit alleges that University of Phoenix executives brag about deceiving the Federal government by creating "smoke and mirrors" so the university may "fly under the radar" of the incentive compensation ban.
In 1992, Congress enacted the Higher Education Act incentive compensation ban to stop egregious recruiting abuses leading to the enrollment of unqualified students. Congress imposed compliance with such ban as a material condition for a university to receive tax payer funded federal financial aid designed to assist poor persons seeking higher education.
When the U.S. Department of Education investigated the whistleblower charges, interviewing about 90 witnesses and reviewing University compensation documents, the Department concluded that the University of Phoenix "systematically and intentionally operates in a duplicitous manner so as to violate the Department's prohibition against incentive compensation while evading detection."
Case Update: Court Rules Lawsuit May Proceed
On August 20, 2007, U.S. District Court Judge Garland E. Burrell issued an order denying a motion by the University of Phoenix to dismiss a far-reaching lawsuit against the university for violating Federal law, the so-called incentive compensation ban.
"The Higher Education Act prohibits colleges and universities that provide federal financial aid to students from using incentive payments to employees for recruiting students, which is precisely the course of conduct the University of Phoenix pursued," stated plaintiffs' attorney Robert J. Nelson. "The Court's decision is a significant victory for students and taxpayers. We look forward to a trial on the merits."
In the summer of 2007, the whistleblowers augmented their existing legal team of practitioners Nancy Krop and Daniel Bartley with additional plaintiffs' attorneys from the three well-regarded law firms of Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Altshuler Berzon LLP and McGuinn, Hillsman & Palefsky, LLP.
About Lieff Cabraser
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is a fifty-plus attorney law firm that has represented plaintiffs nationwide since 1972. We have offices in San Francisco, New York and Nashville. We represent plaintiffs in class and group actions and in individual lawsuits in cases involving substantial losses. For the last six years, the National Law Journal has selected Lieff Cabraser as one of the top plaintiffs' law firms in the nation.
Notice
This website is sponsored by Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, a national plaintiffs' law firm.
Notice: Lieff Cabraser attorneys provide legal advice and practice law for clients in
federal courts throughout the United States and in state courts where we are
licensed to practice. Please read our disclaimer.
Copyright © 2009 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP.
No persons pictured on this website are clients of Lieff Cabraser.