Johnson & Johnson Gender Discrimination
Lieff Cabraser is investigating allegations that Johnson & Johnson uses a forced ranking performance review system that systematically undervalues female employees compared to their male peers, leading to lower pay and promotion rates for women professionals at the company.
Experts have identified such forced ranking as inherently defective, but it is the kind of employment practice that is susceptible to being changed from outside via litigation, especially if approached collectively on behalf of groups of affected employees.
If you are a current or former female employee of Johnson & Johnson, please contact us confidentially via the form below to discuss your rights and options at no charge.
Contact us
Civil Litigation News
San Francisco Schools Receive Financial Boost From Settlement With JUUL
As reported by the S.F. Chronicle, the San Francisco Unified School District has been awarded a substantial $24.65 million payment from vaping
Final Approval Granted to Historic $235M Settlement with Altria in National JUUL Youth E-Cigarette Predatory Advertising, Addiction and Injury Litigation
On March 14, 2024, U.S. District Judge William Orrick of the Northern District of California issued an order granting final approval to a comprehensive
New York Times Spotlights Lieff Cabraser’s Recent Win on Behalf of Hawaiian Kona Coffee Farmers
The New York Times has published an exemplary piece highlighting Lieff Cabraser’s leadership in securing a pivotal victory for Kona coffee farmers