April 10, 2023 Update: The Court issued an order denying Save Mart’s motion to dismiss the case on April 7, 2023. You can read a copy of the order here. This order means that the case will go forward. The next step in the case is for the parties to take discovery of the other side’s claims and defenses through collecting documents and taking depositions. This discovery process can take anywhere from six months to a year or more. If you are a Save Mart non-union retiree, you do not need to do anything at this time to be included in the case. If you would like to be included in our contact list, you may fill out the form on this page.

February 16, 2023 Update: Save Mart filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on January 23, 2023. Plaintiffs filed an opposition on February 15, 2023. Click here to read Plaintiffs’ opposition. The Court will hear oral argument on the motion to dismiss from the parties’ lawyers on March 29, 2023 at 2:00 pm pacific time by videoconference. Hearings are open to members of the public and you may listen to the hearing if you’d like to, either by zoom or by phone.

Option to join by zoom:
https://cand-uscourts.zoomgov.com/j/1611812513?pwd=anFJWCtUaHVhY2RYLzNtVDMxU3NVQT09
Webinar ID: 161 181 2513
Password: 478314

Option to join by phone:
(669) 254-5252 or (646) 828-7666

November 23, 2022 Update: Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on November 22, 2022. Save Mart’s deadline to respond to the Amended Complaint is January 23, 2023. Click here to read the Amended Complaint.

November 1, 2022 Update: Save Mart filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on October 17, 2022. Plaintiffs will file an amended complaint by November 22, 2022, and Save Mart will have until January 23, 2023 to either file an answer to the amended complaint, or file a new motion to dismiss.

On August 11, 2022, Lieff Cabraser and co-counsel Bolt Keenley Kim filed a class action lawsuit in federal court in California against Save Mart Supermarkets, the largest regional grocer in California, operating over 200 Save Mart, Lucky, and FoodMaxx stores. The lawsuit alleges Save Mart misrepresented to its employees that if they worked long enough to become eligible for retirement, they would receive retiree medical benefits for the rest of their lives. Then, in 2022, the company terminated the medical benefit, depriving hundreds or thousands of retirees of their medical benefits.

As alleged in the complaint, this action by Save Mart was exceptionally brutal, as most class members had worked at its stores for at least thirty years in exchange for the understanding that they would be taken care of in retirement. In eliminating the medical benefit, Save Mart broke faith with its most dedicated workers.

To learn more about the lawsuit and how it may affect you, use the form on this page to contact an employment law advocate at Lieff Cabraser. Lieff Cabraser’s Employment practice group is a nationally-recognized leader in the pursuit of protecting workers rights. We have repeatedly prevailed in and obtained significant recoveries for our clients in precedent-setting employment cases against the largest corporations in the U.S. and throughout the world, including Walmart, IBM, Federal Express, Smith Barney, and Home Depot. The Employment practice group’s honors include The Recorder’s 2015 California Litigation Department of the Year and U.S. News and Best Lawyers 2013 national “Law Firm of the Year” award in the category of Employment Law – Individuals.