National Arbitration Forum
Issue: Fraud and conspiracy
National Arbitration Forum Consumer Fraud Lawsuit
Lieff Cabraser represents consumers in a class action lawsuit against the National Arbitration Forum (“NAF”), and several entities related to NAF. The suit alleges that the defendants conspired to conduct sham consumer debt arbitrations that harmed consumers.
NAF Lawsuit Plaintiffs’ Allegations
As the largest consumer credit arbitration company in the nation, the NAF holds itself out to the public, courts and consumers as a neutral third party arbitration service. The NAF claims it is independent of the debt collection agencies and creditors that use its services.
In fact, as alleged in the complaint against the NAF and the other defendants, the NAF is closely tied to the credit and debt collections industries. As a result, consumers whose cases are arbitrated through the NAF are placed at a significant disadvantage. Specific allegations against the NAF include:
- The NAF has conspired with several major creditors to mandate binding arbitration clauses in the term and condition of sale in standard consumer debt agreements such as credit cards, consumer loans, utilities, telecommunications, health care and consumer leases. This conspiracy eliminates consumer access to the court system.
- The NAF conceals its link to the credit agencies through extensive affirmative representations, material omission and complex and opaque corporate structuring.
- The NAF conducts sham arbitrations which virtually always result in a favorable ruling for the banks and credit card companies that utilize NAF’s services.
- The NAF and co-defendants have profited unfairly from this biased process.
On February 22, 2010, U.S. District Court Judge Paul A. Magnuson denied in large part motions to dismiss the class action lawsuit filed by consumers against the NAF and several entities that own NAF, alleging fraud and racketeering activity. The plaintiffs, consumers whose debt disputes were submitted to binding arbitration before the NAF, allege NAF conducted sham arbitrations that resulted in rulings in favor of creditors.
Civil Litigation News
Lieff Cabraser Announces Historic $235M Comprehensive Settlement with Altria in National JUUL Youth E-Cigarette Predatory Advertising, Addiction and Injury Cases
Unprecedented in scope, speed, and significance, the global settlement, reached just after plaintiffs concluded their case in the bellwether trial in San
Avery Halfon Named to Law360’s 2023 Consumer Protection Editorial Advisory Board
Law360 has selected Lieff Cabraser attorney Avery Halfon to serve as one of the lawyers on its 2023 Consumer Protection Editorial Advisory board.
Ex-JUUL COO Claims He Was Fired For Sharing Concerns About JUUL Targeting Teen Users
As reported by Law360 in its ongoing coverage of the JUUL multidistrict injury and predatory/fraudulent advertising litigation against Altria (formerly Philip Morris), extraordinary